Friday, December 12, 2008
Center for Media and Democracy Release 2008 Falsies Award Winners
Friday, December 05, 2008
Vote "NO" for Nuclear Power at Change.org
Go here to vote for No new nuclear power on Change.org.
Nuclear power is far from renewable and far from clean. On
Somehow the nuclear PR machine has been successful at poo-pooing what is the most toxic and depraved consequence of Nuclear Power: Nuclear Waste. We have no way to dispose of it, it will last thousands of years, and it's highly radioactive.
With so many people handling the day to day operations of each plant, can anyone honestly guarantee that not one worker will ever make a potentially fatal mistake? Just a few months ago security personal at the Peach Bottom nuclear power plant in PA were caught sleeping on the job. If terrorists picked that time and place to attack, we would not be protected by Wackenhut. Thousands of people work at these plants and are responsible for their safety.
And the least talked about danger posed by an increased use of nuclear power is nuclear proliferation. Nuclear power plants are intrinsically linked to nuclear weapons. On
Finally, the only reason nuclear power is affordable is because of the generous subsidies the tax payers provide the industry. The Price-Anderson Act, for example, provides nuclear power operators with federal insurance. Think about it--the potential liability of these monsters is so huge it’s impossible for a company to insure them privately and still make a profit. This means that if a plant melts down and kills thousands, or if it causes any other small or large disaster, you, me, and all other tax payers pay for the clean up. This is privatizing the benefits and socializing the consequences of business at it's most sick and twisted.
Nuclear Power should be taken off President Obama's table. In fact he should be working to slowly faze out all Nuclear Power plants. Nuclear Power is not safe, renewable, affordable, or clean.
Thursday, December 04, 2008
Rahm Emanuel: The New Cheney in the Whitehouse?
ProPublica has a great series on Rahmbo (much of which is based on various investigative reports in other sources). His relationship to Wallstreet is eerily similar to that of Cheney and Halliburton. The comparison to Cheney may be jaring to some, but consider the facts. According to these articles he was in the top 3-5% highest paid investment bankers in the nation druing his brief time with Wasserstein Perella, an investment bank (now defunct). Cheney made a killing at Halliburton with wonderful stock options. Emanuel has deep connections in Wallstreet that he keeps in contact with still. Investment bankers and members of the securities were his biggest backers when he ran for congress. He was able to use some of the Wasserstein loot he made to back his own campaign during some financial difficulties. He owes Wallstreet and he is a veracious fighter. Cheney too has been a varacious fighter in the Whitehouse, who by most accounts has used his dogged determinism to push for outrageous contracts for Halliburton (and it's former subsideriary, KBR). They are both the rabbid dogs of their respective parties with deep ties to the biggest robber barons of our time. These are not reassuring attributes in a Commander in Chief Chief of Staff. I see not the Change.
To read the reports click the links below:
Rahmbo’s Revolving Door
Rahmbo’s Revolving Door Revisited
Rahmbo’s Revolving Door: Take 3
Wednesday, December 03, 2008
Obama Future Target of White Supremacists?
When will these idiots learn that race is a social construct? Many white and black people have more genetically in common with people of the opposite "race" than they do to people of there own "race." In fact genetics are far more complicated than our classifications of race suggest (read this article for instance). White supremacists: it's time to face the fact that you are ignorant, half-brained toads. Start blaming your parents, poor education, and bad psychology for your problems.